Hoppe, II et al v. Percheron Associates, LLC et al
Filing
55
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION. The 54 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice is granted and this civil action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his, her, or its own attorney fees and costs. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/6/13. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03233-CBS
ROGER HOPPE II, a resident of Michigan, and
CONUNDRUM COMMUNICATIONS INVESTMENTS, INC., a Michigan corporation,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PERCHERON ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and
RONDA S. CANTER, an individual and resident of Massachusetts,
Defendants;
and
PERCHERON GROWTH, LLC,
Counterclaim Plaintiff.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
____________________________________________________________________________
This civil action comes before the court on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with
Prejudice. On February 29, 2012, this case was referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
to handle all dispositive matters including trial and entry of a final judgment in accordance with
28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and D.C. COLO. LCivR 72.2. (See Doc. # 23). The court
having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation, the entire case file, and the applicable law and now
being sufficiently advised in the premises,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (filed August 5,
2013) (Doc. # 54) is GRANTED and this civil action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his, her, or its own attorney fees and costs.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 6th day of August, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?