Hoppe, II et al v. Percheron Associates, LLC et al

Filing 55

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION. The 54 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice is granted and this civil action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his, her, or its own attorney fees and costs. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/6/13. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action No. 11-cv-03233-CBS ROGER HOPPE II, a resident of Michigan, and CONUNDRUM COMMUNICATIONS INVESTMENTS, INC., a Michigan corporation, Plaintiffs, v. PERCHERON ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and RONDA S. CANTER, an individual and resident of Massachusetts, Defendants; and PERCHERON GROWTH, LLC, Counterclaim Plaintiff. ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION ____________________________________________________________________________ This civil action comes before the court on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. On February 29, 2012, this case was referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer to handle all dispositive matters including trial and entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and D.C. COLO. LCivR 72.2. (See Doc. # 23). The court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation, the entire case file, and the applicable law and now being sufficiently advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (filed August 5, 2013) (Doc. # 54) is GRANTED and this civil action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his, her, or its own attorney fees and costs. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 6th day of August, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?