Lequire v. Astrue
Filing
12
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiff's Brief due by 6/11/2012. SS Defendant's Brief due by 7/11/2012. SS Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 7/26/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 5/2/12. (lygsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03243-AP
PETER LEQUIRE,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
______________________________________________________________________
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Newall
730 N. Weber Street, Suite 101
Colorado Springs, CO 80903
719-633-5211
fnewall@questoffice.net
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
KEVIN TRASKOS
Chief, Civil Division
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov
Robert L. Van Saghi
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 844-1948
(303) 844-0770 (facsimile)
robert.vansaghi@ssa.gov
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 12/12/11
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: 1/4/12
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 4/4/12
4.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of his knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties agreed to the following schedule:
A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due:
6/11/12
B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due:
7/11/12
C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 7/26/12
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant’s Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
-2-
10.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11.
OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR
CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY
SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED
UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD,
AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 2nd day of May 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
_______
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
3
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
s/Frederick W. Newall
Frederick W. Newall
730 N. Weber Street, Suite 101
Colorado Springs, CO 80903
719-633-5211
fnewall@questoffice.net
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
KEVIN TRASKOS
Chief, Civil Division
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov
s/ Robert L. Van Saghi
Robert L. Van Saghi
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 844-1948
robert.vansaghi@ssa.gov
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?