Gongaware et al v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al

Filing 164

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Motion Hearing held on 1/17/2013. 142 Motion to Compel is DENIED; 149 Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash is GRANTED; 153 Motion to Quash is GRANTED. FTR: BNB Courtroom A401. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND Civil Action: Courtroom Deputy: 11-cv-03257-REB-BNB Julie Dynes Date: January 17, 2013 FTR: BNB Courtroom A401 Parties Attorney(s) LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff(s) Thomas M. Dunford v. FERRELLGAS, INC Richard A. Waltz Defendant(s) ADVANCED ENGINEERING Interested Party Michael W. Anderson COURTROOM MINUTES MOTIONS HEARING Court in Session: 1:30 p.m. Appearance of counsel. Argument presented on [142] Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s Motion to Compel Production of Service Head Adapter Information From Defendant Ferrellgas, Inc.’s Expert Witness and [149] Defendant Ferrellgas, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s Subpoena Duces Tecum to Advance Engineering, and [153] Advanced Engineering’s Motion to Quash. ORDERED: [142] Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s Motion to Compel Production of Service Head Adapter Information From Defendant * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 Ferrellgas, Inc.’s Expert Witness is DENIED. [149] Defendant Ferrellgas, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Plaintiff Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s Subpoena Duces Tecum to Advance Engineering is GRANTED. [153] Advanced Engineering’s Motion to Quash is GRANTED. Court in Recess: 2:14 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:44 * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?