Moore v. Astrue

Filing 20

FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 19 Order. By Clerk on 3/27/13. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-03318-REB ANGELINE L. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.1 FINAL JUDGMENT This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in accordance with the Order Reversing Disability Decision and Remanding to Commissioner [#19] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on March 25, 2013, which order is incorporated herein by this reference. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the conclusion of the Commissioner through the Administrative Law Judge that plaintiff was not disabled is REVERSED; and 2. That this case is REMANDED to the ALJ, who is directed to a. Reevaluate whether plaintiff’s chronic pain syndrome constitutes a severe impairment at step 2 of the sequential evaluation; b. Re-contact any treating, examining, or reviewing sources for further clarification of their findings, seek the testimony of additional medical 1 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin, who as of Feb. 14, 2013 has been named as the Acting Commissioner, is automatically substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. or vocational experts, order additional consultative or other examinations, or otherwise further develop the record as she deems necessary; c. Reevaluate her determinations at the remaining steps of the sequential evaluation process in light of her conclusions regarding whether chronic pain syndrome constitute a severe impairment at step 2; and d. Reassess the disability determination. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 27th day of March, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?