Kane v. Honeywell Hommed, LLC et al
Filing
84
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 83 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Clerk on 8/1/2013. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03352-PAB-KLM
MARY KANE, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
HONEYWELL HOMMED, LLC, and
TERRY DUESTERHOEFT,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 83] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on
July 30, 2013 it is
ORDERED that Defendant Honeywell HomMed, LLC’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [Docket No. 53] is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff Mary Kane’s claims against
HomMed for a hostile work environment and retaliatory termination in violation of Title
VII are dismissed. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim against HomMed for intentional infliction of emotional
distress. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims against Mr. Duesterhoeft for intentional infliction of
emotional distress and intrusion on seclusion and will therefore not rule on Defendant
Duesterhoeft’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support [Docket No. 52]. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that this case is remanded to the District Court for the
County of Boulder, Colorado, where this case was filed as No. 2011cv941.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this 1st day of August, 2013.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/ Edward P. Butler
Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?