Kane v. Honeywell Hommed, LLC et al

Filing 84

FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 83 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Clerk on 8/1/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-03352-PAB-KLM MARY KANE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. HONEYWELL HOMMED, LLC, and TERRY DUESTERHOEFT, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 83] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on July 30, 2013 it is ORDERED that Defendant Honeywell HomMed, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 53] is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff Mary Kane’s claims against HomMed for a hostile work environment and retaliatory termination in violation of Title VII are dismissed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim against HomMed for intentional infliction of emotional distress. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims against Mr. Duesterhoeft for intentional infliction of emotional distress and intrusion on seclusion and will therefore not rule on Defendant Duesterhoeft’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support [Docket No. 52]. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is remanded to the District Court for the County of Boulder, Colorado, where this case was filed as No. 2011cv941. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 1st day of August, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?