Miller v. Lusk et al

Filing 146

JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Bast, Lusk, Martinez, Odell against Daniel Brent Miller pursuant to ORDER 145 . by Clerk on 2/3/14. (rbjcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-03365-RBJ-BNB DANIEL BRENT MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CORPERAL LUSK, Teller Sheriff, DEPUTY BAST, Teller Sheriff, DEPUTY ODELL, Teller Sheriff, and DEPUTY MARTINEZ, Teller Sheriff, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the ORDER [Doc. No. 145] of Judge R. Brooke Jackson entered on Jan. 29, 2014, APPROVING and ADOPTING the magistrate judge’s recommendation that the action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with orders of the court, it is ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants LUSK, BAST, ODELL and MARTINEZ and against Plaintiff DANIEL BRENT MILLER, who recovers nothing, and the action is dismissed on the merits. Defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 upon the filing of a bill of costs within 14 days’ entry of judgment. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 3rd day of February, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Julie Dynes Julie Dynes, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?