Crews v. Weaver-Osterholtz et al

Filing 32

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Status Conference held on 6/12/2012. Plaintiff fails to appear. Show Cause Hearing set for 7/2/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judg e Michael J. Watanabe. Plaintiff shall appear in person; defense counsel may appear by telephone.Granting 21 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw. James W. Avery is terminated. Granting 30 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. Plaint iff shall file certification of review on or before 7/2/2012. Granting Defendants' Oral Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2013. Defendants' deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses 10/9/2012. 27 Scheduling Order is amended. (Court Reporter: FTR - Ellen E. Miller) (mjwcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe Civil Action No. 11-cv-03369-CMA-MJW FTR - Courtroom A-502 Date: Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller June 12, 2012 Counsel Parties SHANNON CREWS, James W. Avery Plaintiff(s), v. DANA WEAVER-OSTERHOLTZ, and PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER, INC., David D. Karr Barbara H. Glogiewicz Defendant(s). COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE Court in Session: 9:45 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. The time set for this Status Conference is 9:30 a.m. The Court has waited to call the case to allow Plaintiff time to call the Court as ordered. Plaintiff has failed to appear. It is ORDERED: A SHOW CAUSE HEARING is set JULY 02, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. (Mountain Time) in Courtroom A-502, Fifth floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. A written ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE shall issue. Plaintiff shall appear in person for the Show Cause Hearing. Defense counsel may appear by telephone conference call. Both defense counsel are to be on the call before the Court is contacted. Once the conference call is established, the Court shall be added as the final connection by dialing (303) 844-2403 at the scheduled time. The Court raises Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw for argument. With no objections, It is ORDERED: Plaintiff’s MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW [Docket No. 21, Filed May 01, 2012] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. The Plaintiff shall either retain new counsel forthwith or must be prepared to proceed pro se for all further hearings, motions, pleadings, and trial in this civil action. The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove all addresses for electronic notification for attorney James W. Avery. The Clerk of the Court is directed to add the mailing address for the Plaintiff: Shannon Crews 726 Shadybrook Ln. Flushing, MI 48433 No telephone number is available for the Plaintiff at this time. The Court raises Plaintiff’s second motion for enlargement of time to file certificate of review. Objections by both defense counsel are heard. Objections are overruled. It is ORDERED: Plaintiff’s SECOND MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF REVIEW [Docket No. 30, filed June 05, 2012] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. No further extensions shall be allowed. It is ORDERED: Plaintiff shall file a CERTIFICATE OF REVIEW on or before JULY 02, 2012. Mr. Karr on behalf of defendants makes an Oral motion to amend certain dates in the Scheduling Order. With no objections, It is ORDERED: Defendants’ ORAL MOTION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. It is ORDERED: Scheduling Order [Docket No. 27, filed May 07, 2012 nunc pro tunc to May 03, 2012] is amended as follows: Dispositive Motion Deadline: JANUARY 14, 2013 Defendants’ deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses: OCTOBER 09, 2012 Hearing concluded. Court in recess: 10:04 a.m. Total In-Court Time 00:19 To order a transcript of this proceedings, contact Avery Wood Reports (303) 825-6119 or Page 2 of 2 Toll Free 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?