Lilak v. Takeda Pharmaceutical North America, INC.
Filing
51
MINUTE ORDER denying 48 Motion Rule 12(e) Amended Pleadings-Complaint-Declaration. The court notes that plaintiff's pro se status does not entitle him to application of different rules. Wells v. Krebs, 2010 WL 3521777, at *2 (D. Colo. Sept. 1, 2010) by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 06/18/14.(jhawk, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03379-PAB-MJW
SAFDAR LILAK,
Plaintiff,
v.
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion Rule 12(e) Amended PleadingsComplaint-Declaration (Docket No. 48) is DENIED for failure to comply with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1(b). The court notes that plaintiff's pro se status does not entitle
him to application of different rules. Wells v. Krebs, 2010 WL 3521777, at *2 (D. Colo.
Sept. 1, 2010).
Date: June 18, 2014
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
