Lilak v. Astrazenca Pharmaceutical-US Inc., Corporation

Filing 42

MINUTE ORDER denying 40 After Scheduling Conference, of March 6th, 2012 & 07/23/12 Rule D.C.Colo.LCivR16.1/16.2 Flurry of Motions & Objections to MJW Recommendation Plaintiff Proposes Following. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/21/12.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00031-PAB-MJW
SAFDAR LILAK,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
ASTRAZENCA PHARMACEUTICAL-US INC., CORPORATION,
Defendant(s).
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s “After Scheduling Conference, of March
6th, 2012 & 07/23/12 Rule D.C.Colo.LCivR16.1/16.2 Flurry of Motions & Objections to
MJW Recommendation Plaintiff Proposes Following” (Docket No. 40), insofar as it can
be considered a motion, is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6) is
pending, this court having recommended dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint (Docket No.
33). Accordingly, the court will not order ADR and defendant is not obligated to answer
plaintiff’s complaint at this time.
Date: August 21, 2012