Bynum v. Hancock et al

Filing 87

MINUTE ORDER. ORDERED that such document (Docket No. 85) shall be docketed as a Reply to the Defendants' Response to Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 80 rather than as a motion. It does not appear to be an actual motion although it as captioned as such by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/08/13 (jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00064-WYD-MJW
CECIL BYNUM,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
MUNICIPALITY, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,
KERI JOHNSON,
DAVID RYAN,
AP RICHMOND,
J CASIAS,
J ANDREWS,
J SIMMONS, and
ROBERT HART
Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
Upon review of the plaintiff’s Motion for Justifiable Excuse or Excusable Neglect
for the Sir-Reply, Combined Motions Pursuant to Rule 12(g)(2), and Rule 201 (Docket
No. 85), it is hereby
ORDERED that such document (Docket No. 85) shall be docketed as a Reply to
the Defendants’ Response to Objection to Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge (Docket No. 80) rather than as a motion. It does not appear to be an actual
motion although it as captioned as such.
Date: March 8, 2013