Seck v. CaridianBCT, Inc et al

Filing 19

ORDER Of DISMISSAL. The Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant To FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) 18 filed May 29, 2012, is APPROVED. The Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set for March 29, 2013, are VACATED . The jury trial set to commence April 15, 2013, is VACATED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/29/12. (mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 12-cv-00088-REB-BNB ROUN SECK, Plaintiff, v. CARIDIANBCT, INC., GAMBRO, INC., CARIDIANBCT HOLDING CORP., and TERUMO CORPORATION, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant To FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) [#18]1 filed May 29, 2012. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant To FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) [#18] filed May 29, 2012, is APPROVED; 2. That the Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set for March 29, 2013, are VACATED; 1 “[#18]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 3. That the jury trial set to commence April 15, 2013, is VACATED; 4. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and 5. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated May 29, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?