Rea v. Re/Max,L.L.C. et al

Filing 20

ORDER Denying 19 Defendant's Second Motion to Dismiss or Strike, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/23/2012.(rpmcd )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00090-RPM
DAVID W. REA, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
RE/MAX, L.L.C.;
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE
_____________________________________________________________________

This matter is set for a scheduling conference on April 18, 2012. On March 22,
2012, the defendant filed a second motion to dismiss and motion to strike, or in the
alternative, for more definite statement. The motion is not necessary. The scope of the
claims in the case will be considered and clarified at the scheduling conference and
counsel are expected to discuss these matters in the preparation of a proposed
scheduling order. The purpose of Rule 16 is to avoid motions practice that is not
necessary. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the defendant’s second motion to dismiss and motion to strike,
or in the alternative, for more definite statement is denied.
DATED: March 23rd, 2012
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge