Ponis v. Hartley, et al
FINAL JUDGMENT re: 51 Order, by Clerk on 4/2/13. (sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00141-LTB
STEVE HARTLEY, Warden of Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility,
TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, Colorado Director of Corrections (CDOC), and
JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado,
PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Orders
entered during the course of proceedings in this case, the following FINAL JUDGMENT
is hereby entered.
I. PURSUANT to and in accordance with the Order to Dismiss In Part and for
Answer entered by the Honorable Lewis T. Babcock on August 7, 2012, incorporated
herein by reference, it is
ORDERED that claims 1(e), 1(f), 1(g), 1(h), 1(i), 1(j) and 1(k), 2(a), 2(b), 2(c),
2(d), 2(e), 3(b) and 3(c) are DISMISSED as procedurally barred.
II. PURSUANT to and in accordance with the Order Denying Application for a
Writ of Habeas Corpus entered by the Honorable Lewis T. Babcock on February 21,
2013, incorporated herein by reference, it is
ORDERED that the Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of
Respondents, Steve Hartley, Tom Clements, and John Suthers, and against Petitioner,
Kevin Ponis. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and this civil action are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of
appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear his own costs and attorney's
DATED at Denver, Colorado this
2nd day of April, 2013.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
s/ Edward P. Butler
Edward P. Butler,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?