Marlatt et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 37

ORDER REMANDING CASE. ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the District Court for Ouray County, Colorado, where it was originally filed as Case No. 2011cv57, with each party responsible for its own attorneys' fees and costs by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 04/12/12.(jjhsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 12-cv-00166-WYD-CBS PAULA MARLATT and WILLIAM W. MARLATT, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA; J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO.; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; ONEWEST BANK, FSB; JEANNINE CASOLARI as Public Trustee; of Ouray County, CO; and ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS WHO CLAIM ANY INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS ACTION, Defendants. ORDER REMANDING CASE THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Notice of Removal, filed January 20, 2012 [ECF No. 1]; Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand Back to [State] District Court, filed February 10, 2012 [ECF No. 21]; and Defendants Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, for itself and as acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, Washington Mutual Bank, FA, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s (collectively, the “Bank -1- Defendants”) Unopposed Motion to Remand Action to State Court, filed April 6, 2012 [ECF No. 36]. Upon review of the above-referenced motions and the file herein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the District Court for Ouray County, Colorado, where it was originally filed as Case No. 2011cv57, with each party responsible for its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Dated: April 12, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel WILEY Y. DANIEL, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?