Arrington v. Born-n-Raised, Inc. et al
Filing
147
ORDER denying 98 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. Granting 99 Defendant's Motion in Limine. Denying without prejudice 100 Defendant's Motion in Limine. Granting 101 Defendant's Motion in Limine. Denying without prejudice 102 Defendant's Motion in Limine. Denying 103 Defendant's Motion in Limine. Granting 104 Defendant's Motion in Limine, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/1/2013. (eseam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00172-LTB-KLM
TROY R. ARRINGTON, II,
Plaintiff,
v.
BORN-N-RAISED, INC., and TIMOTHY R. CHAVEZ,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to my Order dated May 17, 2013, the parties have filed nine motions in limine.
Two of these motions relate to proposed expert testimony (see Doc #s 97 & 105) and will be
addressed separately. With respect to the remaining motions in limine, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence [ Doc # 98] is DENIED;
2. Defendant’s Motion in Limine re: Traffic Citation, Criminal Proceedings, and
Investigating Officer’s Opinions [Doc # 99] is GRANTED;
3. Defendant’s Motion in Limine re: Insurance [Doc # 100] is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE;
4. Defendant’s Motion in Limine re: Workers’ Compensation Impairment Rating [Doc #
101] is GRANTED;
5. Defendant’s Motion in Limine re: Defendant’s Opinions [Doc # 102] is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
6. Defendant’s Motion in Limine re: Unreliable Claim Note [ Doc # 103] is DENIED but
the Court will give an appropriate limiting instruction regarding the fact that Defendant has
insurance; and
7. Defendant’s Motion in Limine re: Plaintiff’s Social Security Disability [ Doc # 104] is
GRANTED.
Dated: November
1
, 2013 in Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?