Arrington v. Born-n-Raised, Inc. et al

Filing 80

ORDER. BNR's Motion for Approval of Defendants' Bill of Costs 41 is GRANTED to the extent that BNR is entitled to costs as the prevailing party. The amount of costs awarded to BNR shall be determined by the court clerk, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/15/2013.(wjmcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00172-LTB-KLM
TROY R. ARRINGTON, II,
Plaintiff,
v.
TIMOTHY R. CHAVEZ,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This case is before me on Defendant Born N’ Raised’s (“BNR”) Motion for Approval of
Defendant’s Bill of Costs [Doc # 41] based on my Order dated October 22, 2012 granting BNR’s
Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing BNR as a party in this case. As the prevailing
party on Plaintiff’s claims against it, BNR is entitled to an award of costs pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 54(d)(1). Such costs shall be requested via the appropriate form and taxed by the clerk.
See D.C.Colo.LCivR 54.1. See also 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (listing items taxable as costs).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that BNR’s Motion for Approval of Defendants’ Bill of
Costs is GRANTED to the extent that BNR is entitled to costs as the prevailing party. The
amount of costs awarded to BNR shall be determined by the court clerk.

Dated: May

15

, 2013 in Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE