Allen v. Astrue

Filing 8

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiff's Brief due by 5/31/2012. SS Defendant's Brief due by 7/2/2012. SS Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 7/17/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/23/12. (lygsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00225-AP
ANGELA J. ALLEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
GORDON W. WILLIAMS
143 Union Blvd., Suite 270
Lakewood, CO 80228
[phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
[e-mail]
THOMAS S. INMAN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

Date Complaint Was Filed: 01/26/2012

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 02/02/2012

C.

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 04/02/2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
There are no issues with the accuracy or completeness of the administrative record.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
None anticipated.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
This case does not involve unusually complicated or out-of-the-ordinary claims.

7. OTHER MATTERS
None.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 05/31/2012

B.

Defendant's Response Brief Due: 07/02/2012

C.

Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 07/17/2012

-2-

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff's Statement:

Oral argument is not requested.

B.

Defendant's Statement: Oral argument is not requested.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.

( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.

B.

(x) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY
OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT,
ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 23rd day of April, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

-3-

APPROVED:
JOHN F. WALSH
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/Gordon W. Williams
GORDON W. WILLIAMS
143 Union Blvd., Suite 270
Lakewood, CO 80228
[phone]
[e-mail]

WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
s/ Thomas S. Inman
THOMAS S. INMAN
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff

-4-