Bush et al v. FedEx Freight, Inc.

Filing 80

MINUTE ORDER; Defendant's 78 Opposed Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Oral Motion for Sanctions re Spoliation is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a Surreply to Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Oral Motion for Sanctions re Spoliation on or before April 8, 2013, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/2/2013.(klmcd, ) Modified on 4/2/2013 to indicate Motion 78 was oppposed (klmcd, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-00230-WYD-KLM CHARLES BUSH, BRAD GRIMSLEY, MARK L. HANSON, and JOHN F. NOBLE, all individuals residing in Colorado, Plaintiffs, v. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC., an Arkansas corporation doing business in Colorado, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Opposed Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Plaintiff’s Reply Brief in Support of Oral Motion for Sanctions re Spoliation [Docket No. 78; Filed April 1, 2013] (the “Motion”). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#78] is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a Surreply to Plaintiff’s Reply Brief in Support of Oral Motion for Sanctions re Spoliation on or before April 8, 2013. Dated: April 2, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?