Hart v. Dillon Companies, Inc.

Filing 32

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT DILLON COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a CITY MARKET'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER granting 22 Motion to Amend Answer. By Magistrate Judge David L. West on 09/27/2012. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge David L. West Civil Action No. 12-CV-00238-MSK-DLW DEBRA A. HART, Plaintiff, vs. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., a Kansas Corporation, d/b/a CITY MARKET, Defendant. ORDER RE: DEFENDANT DILLON COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a CITY MARKET’S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER [DOC. #22] ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST The Defendant, Dillon Companies, Inc., Motion to Amend Answer [Doc. #22] was referred to the Magistrate Judge on June 11, 2012 by Judge Martha S. Krieger. Defendant, Dillon Companies, Inc., filed the Motion to Amend its Answer to add a defense of after acquired evidence based on misconduct uncovered during discovery. That alleged misconduct is the Plaintiff’s taping a conversation with Labor Relations Manager of Defendant, Deborah Ross. That conversation discussed Plaintiff’s appeal of the decision to terminate her employment. The Court finds that McKennon v. Nashville Banner Pub. Co., 512 U.S. 339 applies and this Court finds that Plaintiff is suing Defendant over its handling of the post-termination appeals procedure and that the allegation of post-termination misconduct could be applicable in this case, therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion to Amend Answer [Doc. #22] is GRANTED. DATED: September 27, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/David L. West United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?