Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. ResortBanc Financial, Inc.
Filing
5
ORDER Granting Unopposed Motion for Substitution of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, signed by Douglas County, District Court Judge, Richard B. Caschette, on 1/24/12. (lygsl, )
GRANTED
The moving party is hereby ORDERED
to provide a copy of this Order to
any pro se parties who have entered an
appearance in this action within 10 days
from the date of this order.
Richard B. Caschette
District Court Judge
DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT
DISTRICT COURT, DOUGLAS COUNTY,
COLORADO
Address:
Douglas County Justice Center
4000 Justice Way
Castle Rock, Colorado 80109
EFILED Document
CO Douglas County District Court 18th JD
Filing Date: Jan 24 2012 2:13PM MST
Filing ID: 42102610
Review Clerk: N/A
Plaintiff: COLORADO CAPITAL BANK, a Colorado
Banking corporation,
v.
Defendant: RESORTBANC FINANCIAL, INC., a
Colorado corporation.
▲COURT USE ONLY▲
Case Number: 2011CV842
Division: 3
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER
Having considered the Unopposed Motion for Substitution of Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation as Receiver, made pursuant to C.R.C.P. 25, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of the assets and property of Colorado
Capital Bank is hereby substituted in this action for Plaintiff Colorado Capital Bank. The parties
are hereby directed to modify the caption of the case, as provided above.
SO ORDERED this _____ day of January, 2012
BY THE COURT:
Hon. Richard B. Caschette
District Court Judge
Court: CO Douglas County District Court 18th JD
Judge: Richard B Caschette
Current Date: Jan 24, 2012
Case Number: 2011CV842
Case Name: COLORADO CAPITAL BANK vs. RESORTBANC FINANCIAL INC
Court Authorizer: Richard B Caschette
/s/ Judge Richard B Caschette
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?