Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. ResortBanc Financial, Inc.

Filing 5

ORDER Granting Unopposed Motion for Substitution of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, signed by Douglas County, District Court Judge, Richard B. Caschette, on 1/24/12. (lygsl, )

Download PDF
GRANTED The moving party is hereby ORDERED to provide a copy of this Order to any pro se parties who have entered an appearance in this action within 10 days from the date of this order. Richard B. Caschette District Court Judge DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT DISTRICT COURT, DOUGLAS COUNTY, COLORADO Address: Douglas County Justice Center 4000 Justice Way Castle Rock, Colorado 80109 EFILED Document CO Douglas County District Court 18th JD Filing Date: Jan 24 2012 2:13PM MST Filing ID: 42102610 Review Clerk: N/A Plaintiff: COLORADO CAPITAL BANK, a Colorado Banking corporation, v. Defendant: RESORTBANC FINANCIAL, INC., a Colorado corporation. ▲COURT USE ONLY▲ Case Number: 2011CV842 Division: 3 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER Having considered the Unopposed Motion for Substitution of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, made pursuant to C.R.C.P. 25, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of the assets and property of Colorado Capital Bank is hereby substituted in this action for Plaintiff Colorado Capital Bank. The parties are hereby directed to modify the caption of the case, as provided above. SO ORDERED this _____ day of January, 2012 BY THE COURT: Hon. Richard B. Caschette District Court Judge Court: CO Douglas County District Court 18th JD Judge: Richard B Caschette Current Date: Jan 24, 2012 Case Number: 2011CV842 Case Name: COLORADO CAPITAL BANK vs. RESORTBANC FINANCIAL INC Court Authorizer: Richard B Caschette /s/ Judge Richard B Caschette

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?