Aurora Bank FSB v. First Guaranty Mortgage Corp.
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 18 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/2/2012. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00247-MSK-MEH
AURORA BANK FSB, a Federal Savings Bank,
FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE CORP., a Virginia corporation,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 2, 2012.
The Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Protective Order [filed April 27, 2012; docket #18]
is denied without prejudice and the proposed Protective Order is refused for two reasons. First,
paragraph 19 of the proposed Protective Order fails to properly and clearly describe the procedure
for challenging confidentiality, as set forth in Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382
(D. Colo. 2000). The Court has already advised the parties that it will not enter a protective order
in this case unless the protective order complies with Gillard. (Docket #15.) Second, paragraph 22
of the proposed Protective Order is improper insofar as the Court will not retain jurisdiction over
a protective order after the case is closed. The parties are granted leave to submit a revised proposed
protective order in accordance with Gillard and this minute order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?