Epps v. United Parcel Services Company

Filing 44

MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/9/2012. Denying 33 Motion for Protective Order; Withdrawing 34 Motion for Protective Order; Withdrawing 34 Motion to Quash; Withdrawing 36 Motion to Compel. Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel. (lag)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE R. BROOKE JACKSON Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel Date: August 9, 2012 Civil Action No. 12-cv-00316-RBJ Parties: Counsel: PAMELA EPPS, Christina L. Dixon Adam Kehrli Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICES COMPANY, Steven Gutierrez (by phone) Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING Court in session: 8:03 a.m. Appearances of counsel. Ms. Dixon advises the Court she filed a status report withdrawing Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas Issued by Defendant Doc.# [34] and Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Doc.# [36]. Argument by Mr. Gutierrez and Ms. Dixon as to Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena and Notice of Deposition and Certificate of Compliance with Local Rule 7.1 Doc.# [33]. For the reasons and findings as stated on the record, it is; ORDERED: Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena and Notice of Deposition and Certificate of Compliance with Local Rule 7.1 Doc.# [33] is DENIED with the following conditions: 1. The deposition of Mr. Gray will be taken either in person or by video conference per Mr. Gray’s preference; 2. The deposition is not to exceed one hour; 3. Defendant may cross examine the witness for one hour; 4. This deposition is not a discovery deposition and may be used by any party for any reason. ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas Issued by Defendant Doc.# [34] is WITHDRAWN. ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Doc.# [36] is WITHDRAWN. Court in recess: 8:25 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time: 00:22 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?