Epps v. United Parcel Services Company
Filing
44
MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/9/2012. Denying 33 Motion for Protective Order; Withdrawing 34 Motion for Protective Order; Withdrawing 34 Motion to Quash; Withdrawing 36 Motion to Compel. Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel. (lag)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
JUDGE R. BROOKE JACKSON
Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera
Court Reporter:
Gwen Daniel
Date: August 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00316-RBJ
Parties:
Counsel:
PAMELA EPPS,
Christina L. Dixon
Adam Kehrli
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICES
COMPANY,
Steven Gutierrez (by phone)
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
Court in session:
8:03 a.m.
Appearances of counsel.
Ms. Dixon advises the Court she filed a status report withdrawing Plaintiff’s Motion for
Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas Issued by Defendant Doc.# [34] and Plaintiff’s
Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Doc.# [36].
Argument by Mr. Gutierrez and Ms. Dixon as to Motion for Protective Order and to Quash
Subpoena and Notice of Deposition and Certificate of Compliance with Local Rule 7.1 Doc.#
[33].
For the reasons and findings as stated on the record, it is;
ORDERED: Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena and Notice of Deposition
and Certificate of Compliance with Local Rule 7.1 Doc.# [33] is DENIED with
the following conditions:
1.
The deposition of Mr. Gray will be taken either in person or by video
conference per Mr. Gray’s preference;
2.
The deposition is not to exceed one hour;
3.
Defendant may cross examine the witness for one hour;
4.
This deposition is not a discovery deposition and may be used by any
party for any reason.
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoenas Issued by
Defendant Doc.# [34] is WITHDRAWN.
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses Doc.# [36] is WITHDRAWN.
Court in recess:
8:25 a.m.
Hearing concluded.
Total time:
00:22
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?