Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER granting 16 Plaintiff Chipolte Mexican Grill, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion To Stay Pending Resolution of MDL Motion For Transfer and Consolidation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, or in The Alternative To Vacate and Reset Briefing on Ma rkman Issues. This case is STAYED, pending a decision on Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.'s Motion For Transfer and Consolidation. The briefing schedule prescribed in the court's Order For Briefing on Markman Issues 6 entered February 9, 2012, is VACATED. In the event that Maxim's MDL motion is denied, the parties shall promptly file a joint status report advising the court of the denial and the resultant status of this case. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/16/12.(mjgsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00331-REB
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.

ORDER
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on Plaintiff Chipolte Mexican Grill, Inc.’s Unopposed
Motion To Stay Pending Resolution of MDL Motion For Transfer and
Consolidation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, or in The Alternative To Vacate and
Reset Briefing on Markman Issues [#16]1 filed May 15, 2012. After reviewing the
motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiff Chipolte Mexican Grill, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion To Stay
Pending Resolution of MDL Motion For Transfer and Consolidation Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407, or in The Alternative To Vacate and Reset Briefing on Markman
Issues [#16] filed May 15, 2012, is GRANTED;

1

“[#16]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.

2. That this case is STAYED, pending a decision on Maxim Integrated Products,
Inc.’s Motion For Transfer and Consolidation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in MDL
Action No. 2354 (In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., MDL No. 2354 (MDL Feb. 23,
2012));
3. That the briefing schedule prescribed in the court’s Order For Briefing on
Markman Issues [#6] entered February 9, 2012, is VACATED; and
4. That in the event that Maxim’s MDL motion is denied, the parties shall
promptly file a joint status report advising the court of the denial and the resultant status
of this case.
Dated May 16, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2