Gundlach v. People of the State of Colorado
Filing
19
ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the pending motions 8 11 16 and petitions are denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/4/12.(lygsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00345-BNB
GABRIELE GUNDLACH,
Plaintiff,
v.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, et al.,
CITY AND COUNTY OF BOULDER, CO.,
JEFF CAHN,
DAVID ARCHULETA,
KAROLYN VAL QUEVLI, and
JUDICIAL COURTS OF STATE OF COLORADO, Also Traded as Boulder County
Court/Boulder,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff, Gabriele Gundlach, initiated this action by filing pro se a Petition in the
Form of a Motion for Emergency Stay of Boulder County Court Cases 10M2938,
11M1753, 11M858 for Reasons of Identity Theft and Fraud and Violations of
Defendants Federal Protected Rights (ECF No. 1). On February 29, 2012, Ms.
Gundlach filed a second Petition in the Form of a Motion for Emergency Stay of Boulder
County Court Cases 10M2938, 11M1753, 11M858 for Reason of Identity Theft and
Fraud and Violations of Defendants Federal Protected Rights (ECF No. 8) that appears
to be substantively identical to the original pleading. On March 21, 2012, Ms. Gundlach
filed on the proper form a Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 13) and a third Petition in the
Form of a Motion for Emergency Stay of Boulder County Court Cases 10M2938,
11M1753, 11M858 for Reason of Identity Theft and Fraud and Violations of Defendants
Federal Protected Rights (ECF No. 11).
On March 26, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing
Ms. Gundlach to file an amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with the pleading
requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ms. Gundlach was
warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if she failed to file an
amended Prisoner Complaint within thirty days.
On April 4, 2012, Ms. Gundlach filed a fourth Petition in the Form of a Motion for
Emergency Stay of Boulder County Court Cases 10M2938, 11M1753, 11M858 for
Reason of Identity Theft and Fraud and Violations of Defendants Federal Protected
Rights (ECF No. 16). On April 16, 2012, Ms. Gundlach filed a Motion for a Change of
Venue (ECF No. 17) asking to have this case transferred to the United States Supreme
Court. On April 17, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boland entered a minute order denying the
Motion for a Change of Venue.
Ms. Gundlach has failed to file an amended Prisoner Complaint within the time
allowed. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to file an
amended complaint as directed.
Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3) that any
appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis
status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369
U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal she also must pay the full $455
appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App.
2
P. 24. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint and the action are dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Ms.
Gundlach failed to file an amended complaint as directed. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the pending motions and petitions are denied as
moot. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is
denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma
pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this
4th
day of
May
, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?