Gonzalez v. Cooke et al

Filing 94

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/12/2015. Taking under advisement 92 Defendants' Amended Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. FTR: K. Terasaki. (ebuch)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: Courtroom Deputy: FTR Technician: February 12, 2015 Emily Buchanan Kathy Terasaki Civil Action No. 12-cv-00366-RPM Counsel: MICHAEL GONZALES, David Lane Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF JOHN COOKE, in his official and individual capacities, COMMANDER GREG BROSWELL, in his individual capacity, COMMANDER KENNETH LEACH, in his individual capacity, COMMANDER PAUL GLANZ, in his individual capacity, COMMANDER SALLY GOMEZ, in her individual capacity, and COMMANDER JERAMY HETTINGER, in his individual capacity, Mark Ratner Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING 10:28 a.m. Court in session. Before the Court today is Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Statements by the Court regarding the documents submitted by counsel, its impressions of the case, the problem of qualified immunity, and plaintiff’s thoughts about pursuing each individual defendant. 10:32 a.m. Mr. Lane answers questions of the Court regarding the safety concern with two hit men in the unit, the individuals in charge at the jail, keeping Mr. Gonzales safe at the jail, and a policy issue. 10:45 a.m. Mr. Ratner answers questions of the Court regarding an anonymous tip regarding the hit, the transfer of Mr. Williams, identifying the Sureños gang members, the fullness of the jail, and the lack of an adequate policy. 10:57 a.m. Response by Mr. Lane. ORDERED: Defendants’ Amended Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 (Doc. No. 92) is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. 11:01 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 33 min. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?