Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-29

Filing 28

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 26 Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/2/2012. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00397-WJM-MEH
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOES 1-29,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 2, 2012.
The Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena [filed April 30, 2012; docket #26] filed pro se by
John Doe #3 is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The
Court reminds the parties that it “will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has
conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. ” D.C. Colo.
LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to “state in the motion,
or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule...” Id.