Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-29
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 26 Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/2/2012. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00397-WJM-MEH
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
JOHN DOES 1-29,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 2, 2012.
The Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena [filed April 30, 2012; docket #26] filed pro se by
John Doe #3 is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The
Court reminds the parties that it “will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has
conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. ” D.C. Colo.
LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to “state in the motion,
or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule...” Id.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?