Edwards v. Zenimax Media, Inc., et al
Filing
33
ORDER. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum of Law 5 , filed February 16, 2012, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if the Defendants choose to re-file a motion to dismiss, such a motion must be filed by Friday, October 26, 2012, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/25/12.(sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00411-WYD-KLM
LANDIS EDWARDS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
ZENIMAX MEDIA INC., a Delaware Corporation, and
BETHESDA SOFTWORKS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and
Incorporated Memorandum of Law [ECF No. 5], filed February 16, 2012.
The Court has
contemporaneously filed an order granting Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Class
Allegations and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, [ECF No. 16].
Since the class
allegations of the complaint have been stricken, I have decided to deny the pending
motion to dismiss without prejudice and allow the Defendants to re-file a new motion
tailored to the remaining complaint allegations.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum of
Law [ECF No. 5], filed February 16, 2012, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
FURTHER ORDERED that if the Defendants choose to re-file a motion to
dismiss, such a motion must be filed by Friday, October 26, 2012.
It is
Dated:
September 25, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
WILEY Y. DANIEL,
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?