Duran v. Astrue
Filing
12
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/29/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/29/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/13/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 5/24/12. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00457-AP
ALFRED DURAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Rachael A. Lundy, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
seckarlaw@mindspring.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
William G. Pharo
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
Debra J. Meachum
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street, 6th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 844-1570
debra.meachum@ssa.gov
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed:
2/22/12.
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 3/4/12.
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 5/4/12.
4.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of their knowledge, the parties state that the administrative record is complete
and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
To the best of their knowledge, the parties do not believe the case raises unusual claims
or defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the court.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:
6/29/12.
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 7/29/12.
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 8/13/12.
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
2
10.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
(X) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
B.
( ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11.
OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY
OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT,
ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 24th day of May, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
_s/John L. Kane________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
3
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
For Defendant:
s/Rachael A. Lundy
Rachael A. Lundy, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
seckarlaw@mindspring.com
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
s/Debra J. Meachum
By: Debra J. Meachum
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street, 6th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 844-1570
debra.meachum@ssa.gov
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?