Villages of Parker Master Association, The v. Hansen et al

Filing 17

ORDER: Stipulation Concerning Priority 6 filed by Internal Revenue Service The Court will construe the stipulation concerning priority as a motion for theCourt to approve the stipulation. The Court will grant such motion. The Stipulation Concerning Priority is approved. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/3/12. (pabcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 12-cv-00479-PAB-MEH THE VILLAGES OF PARKER MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC., d/b/a Canterberry Crossing Master Association, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HANSEN, DAWN HANSEN, HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, d/b/a Home Loan Corporation of Texas, d/b/a Expanded Mortgage Credit, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, and DOUGLAS COUNTY PUBLIC TRUSTEE and OCCUPANT, Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation Concerning Priority [Docket No. 6], wherein the parties stipulate that the interests of defendant United States, as reflected in the Notices of Federal Tax Lien, are superior to the interests of plaintiff The Villages of Parker Master Association, Inc. The parties to the stipulation apparently intend for the Court to approve the stipulation, although no motion to that effect has been filed. See Docket No. 7 at 2 (“After the stipulation is approved, no federal interest or question will remain and the case will likely be remanded to the District Court for Douglas County, Colorado”); Docket No. 6-1 (proposed order declaring interests of United States superior to that of plaintiff). The Court will construe the stipulation concerning priority as a motion for the Court to approve the stipulation. The Court will grant such motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Stipulation Concerning Priority [Docket No. 6] is APPROVED. DATED May 3, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?