Escobar v. Foster et al

Filing 142

ORDER granting 140 Motion for Administrative Closure by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/31/13. The pending motions 97 , 100 , 108 , 121 , 124 , 126 , 130 , and 135 are denied without prejudice (dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00489-CMA-KLM
JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASSOCIATE WARDEN S. FOSTER,
DEPUTY DIRECTOR L. REID,
MAJOR L. MALFELD,
LIEUTENANT L. TRAVIS,
LIEUTENANT TEDEMANN,
LIEUTENANT BURKE,
CAPTAIN PADILLA,
CAPTAIN D. WILLIAMS,
SERGEANT MARQUEZ,
SERGEANT MONTGOMERY,
SERGEANT KELEMAN,
SERGEANT HAWKINS,
SERGEANT FRETWELL,
C/O CALDARONELLO,
C/O P. ARCHULETA,
C/O ALANIS,
C/O AURITI,
C/O SAUCIDO,
C/O KITCHEN,
C/O S. HARTUNG,
C/O MONTANEZ,
C/O B. TETRICK, and
C/O VERSTEEGH,
Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE
AND DENYING OTHER MOTIONS

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Administrative Closure
(Doc. # 140). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motion for
Administrative Closure. The Court having reviewed the Motion, and being otherwise
advised, hereby ORDERS:
1.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the

above-referenced civil action pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCiv.R 41.2.
2.

Plaintiff may reopen this matter for good cause, subject to consultation

with his appointed counsel in case number 12-cv-01662-CMA-CBS.
3.

The Court notes that Plaintiff filed a number of pending motions prior to his

instant motion to administratively close. (Doc. ## 97, 100, 108, 121, 124,126, 130, 135)
In light of Plaintiff’s decision to administratively close this case, these motions are all
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DATED: October 31, 2013
BY THE COURT:

_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge

2