Escobar v. Foster et al
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order of a Final Judgement [sic]. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/19/12.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00489-CMA-KLM
JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR,
ASSOCIATE WARDEN S. FOSTER,
DEPUTY DIRECTOR L. REID,
MAJOR L. MALFELD,
LIEUTENANT L. TRAVIS,
CAPTAIN D. WILLIAMS,
C/O P. ARCHULETA,
C/O S. HARTUNG,
C/O B. TETRICK, and
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Order of a Final
Judgement [sic] [Docket No. 37; Filed June 15, 2012]. The request for relief in the Motion
is unclear. To the extent that Plaintiff asks permission to file an amended complaint, the
Court restates its previous instruction, that Plaintiff must submit one proposed Amended
Complaint for the Court’s review, in the interests of judicial efficiency and clarity of the
docket. See [#21]. To the extent that Plaintiff inquires about the status of this case, the
Court informs Plaintiff that Defendants filed an Answer in response to his Complaint on May
30, 2012 [#29], and a Preliminary Scheduling Conference is scheduled for July 3, 2012, at
9:30 a.m. [#31].
Regarding the request for entry of judgment, Plaintiff does not cite any procedural
rule or legal authority in support of this request, thus the Court rejects it as unsubstantiated.
See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C., 7.1H. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART as stated herein.
Dated: June 19, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?