Escobar v. Foster et al

Filing 72

MINUTE ORDER granting 68 Motion for Copy of Plaintiffs Affidavit and Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/29/12.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00489-CMA-KLM
JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASSOCIATE WARDEN S. FOSTER,
DEPUTY DIRECTOR L. REID,
MAJOR L. MALFELD,
LIEUTENANT L. TRAVIS,
LIEUTENANT TEDEMANN,
LIEUTENANT BURKE,
CAPTAIN PADILLA,
CAPTAIN D. WILLIAMS,
SERGEANT MARQUEZ,
SERGEANT MONTGOMERY,
SERGEANT HAWKINS,
SERGEANT FRETWELL,
C/O CALDARONELLO,
C/O P. ARCHULETA,
C/O ALANIS,
C/O AURITI,
C/O SAUCIDO,
C/O KITCHEN,
C/O S. HARTUNG,
C/O MONTANEZ, and
C/O B. TETRICK,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Copy of Plaintiff’s
Affidavit and Scheduling Order [Docket No. 68; Filed October 5, 2012] (the “Motion”).
No response to the Motion has been filed. Plaintiff requests a copy of an Affidavit [#13] he
filed in support of his Complaint [#1] and a copy of the Scheduling Conference Minute
Order [#64] which he claims he never received. Plaintiff explains that in a prior Order [#56],
the Court granted his request for a copy of the Complaint but when he received it, the
affidavit was not included.
1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk’s Office is
directed to mail to Plaintiff a copy of the documents at Docket Nos. 13 and 64. The Court
reminds Plaintiff that regardless of his in forma pauperis status, he is not entitled to
unlimited cost-free copies and forms in this litigation. See Windsor v. Martindale, 175
F.R.D. 665, 670-72 (D. Colo. 1997).
Dated: November 29, 2012

2