Layne Christensen Company v. Mill Man Steel, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER of Dismissal Of Plaintiff Layne Christensen Company's Claims Against Defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. ORDERED The Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Layne Christensen Companys Claims Against Defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. With Prejudice 42 is GRANTED. The claims asserted against defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/23/12.(lygsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 12-cv-00519-REB-KLM
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
MILL MAN STEEL, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
LINCOLN MANUFACTURING, INC., a Texas corporation,
Third-Party Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF LAYNE CHRISTENSEN
COMPANY’S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT MILL MAN STEEL, INC.
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Layne
Christensen Company’s Claims Against Defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. With
Prejudice [#42]1 filed July 19, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the record, I
conclude that the motion should be granted and that plaintiff Layne Christensen
Company’s claims against defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. should be dismissed with
prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Layne Christensen
1
“[#42]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
Company’s Claims Against Defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. With Prejudice [#42]
filed July 19, 2012, is GRANTED;
2. That the claims asserted by plaintiff, Layne Christensen Company against
defendant Mill Man Steel, Inc. are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the
affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs;
3. That plaintiff, Layne Christensen Company is DROPPED as a named party to
this action, and the case caption is amended as indicated below:
MILL MAN STEEL, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
LINCOLN MANUFACTURING, INC., a Texas corporation,
Defendant.
Dated July 23, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?