Jokela v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 29

ORDER OF DISMISSAL APPROVING 27 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Third Party Defendant Carrier Commercial Refrigeration. Defendant Anthony Doors' Third Party Complaint 12 filed March 6, 2012, and all corresponding claims and defenses asserted by the parties are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/18/12. (mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 12-cv-00525-REB-CBS NICOLE JOKELA, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, and ANTHONY DOORS, Defendants, v. ANTHONY DOORS, Third Party Plaintiff, v. CARRIER COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION, INC., d/b/a TYLER REFRIGERATION, Third Party Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Third Party Defendant Carrier Commercial Refrigeration [#27]1 filed July 17, 2012. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that Defendant Anthony Doors’ Third Party Complaint [#12] filed March 6, 2012, should be dismissed with prejudice. 1 “[#27]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Third Party Defendant Carrier Commercial Refrigeration [#27] filed July 17, 2012, is APPROVED; and 2. That Defendant Anthony Doors’ Third Party Complaint [#12] filed March 6, 2012, and all corresponding claims and defenses asserted by the parties are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated July 18, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?