Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. Valenzuala et al
Filing
37
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/3/14. Plaintiff shall seek relief from its service obligations, if at all, by an appropriate motion filed on or before 12/17/2014. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00526-MSK-BNB
GREASE MONKEY INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
ERNESTO ALMADA VALENZUELA, an individual, and
MARIO ALBERTO TREVINO SOLANO,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises in connection with the Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 35] entered on
October 30, 2014. In its Response [Doc. # 36], the plaintiff sought affirmative relief as follows:
If the Central Authority in Mexico does not serve process on
Defendants at their residence addresses, then the Court should
enter an order allowing Grease Monkey to serve Defendants
through email addresses or social media if possible. Grease
Monkey will serve Defendants with the Complaint and Summons
in both English and Spanish. Grease Monkey requests an
enlargement of time until Tuesday, March 3, 2015, to complete
service of process through the Central Authority in Mexico
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1), or through electronic mail or
social media on Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3).
Local rule of practice 7.1(d), D.C.COLO.LCivR, prohibits a party from including a
motion in a response or reply. Instead, “[a] motion shall be filed as a separate document.” Id.
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall seek relief from its service obligations, if at all,
by an appropriate motion filed on or before December 17, 2014.
Dated December 3, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?