Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. Valenzuala et al

Filing 37

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/3/14. Plaintiff shall seek relief from its service obligations, if at all, by an appropriate motion filed on or before 12/17/2014. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 12-cv-00526-MSK-BNB GREASE MONKEY INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. ERNESTO ALMADA VALENZUELA, an individual, and MARIO ALBERTO TREVINO SOLANO, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises in connection with the Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 35] entered on October 30, 2014. In its Response [Doc. # 36], the plaintiff sought affirmative relief as follows: If the Central Authority in Mexico does not serve process on Defendants at their residence addresses, then the Court should enter an order allowing Grease Monkey to serve Defendants through email addresses or social media if possible. Grease Monkey will serve Defendants with the Complaint and Summons in both English and Spanish. Grease Monkey requests an enlargement of time until Tuesday, March 3, 2015, to complete service of process through the Central Authority in Mexico pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1), or through electronic mail or social media on Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Local rule of practice 7.1(d), D.C.COLO.LCivR, prohibits a party from including a motion in a response or reply. Instead, “[a] motion shall be filed as a separate document.” Id. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall seek relief from its service obligations, if at all, by an appropriate motion filed on or before December 17, 2014. Dated December 3, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?