David A. Bovino, P.C. et al v. MacMillan et al

Filing 89

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' 73 MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents is granted as to Defendant Patricia MacMillan and denied without prejudice as to Defendant Christina MacMillan. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/30/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action Number: 12-cv-00551-PAB-MEH
DAVID A. BOVINO P.C., dba Law Offices of Bovino & Associates, and
DAVID A. BOVINO,
Plaintiffs
v.
PATRICIA A. MACMILLAN, and
CHRISTINA MACMILLAN,
Defendants

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
THIS COURT, having heard argument on and reviewed the papers filed in connection
with Plaintiffs David A. Bovino P.C., dba Law Offices of Bovino & Associates, and David A.
Bovino’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents (filed August 9, 2013; docket #73), and
being fully advised in the premises, HEREBY ORDERS that:
1.

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents is GRANTED as to

Defendant Patricia MacMillan;
2.

Defendant Patricia A. MacMillan is to produce by October 11, 2013 the

documents and information responsive to Plaintiffs’ requests for “all documents and
communications from July 22, 2010 through the present between Patricia MacMillan and any
representative of UBS Trust Company, including but not limited to Jan Klein and Seane Baylor,
concerning, referencing, relating to, or specifically mentioning Andrew MacMillan and/or David
Bovino or Bovino Law”;

3.

Defendant Patricia MacMillan may designate any document produced in response

to this Order as “Confidential,” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 33), or, to the
extent that a document contains highly sensitive and personal financial information, may
designate the document or information as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”
Documents or information designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall not
be disclosed to anyone other than: (a) Outside counsel to the parties to this action, and clerical,
secretarial, and paralegal staff employed by such counsel; and (b) Any outside expert or
consultant and their staff retained by counsel to assist in the prosecution or defense of this action.
4.

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents is denied without prejudice

as to Defendant Christina MacMillan. Plaintiffs are free to renew their Motion to Compel
Production of Documents (docket #73) as to Defendant Christina MacMillan should Plaintiffs
encounter information in the documents produced by Defendant Patricia MacMillan in response
to this Order that Plaintiffs believe, in good faith, supports doing so.
Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 30th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge

2