Coit v. Zavaras et al
Filing
22
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. ORDER denying 21 Motion to Correct Typing Error and Omissions, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/25/2012.(skssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00609-BNB
JILL COIT,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARISTEDES ZAVARAZ [sic], Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
JAMES WELTON, Director of C.I.D.,
LARRY REID, L.V.C.F.,
ROBERT CANTWELL, Director of Prison,
LLOYD WAIDE, L.V.C.F.,
MICHAEL DOUSSARD, L.V.C.F., (Spelling),
C.I.D. DENNIS HOUGHNON, Pueblo,
C.I.D. Colin Carson, D.W.C.F.,
JOHN MARTIN,
JANE/JOHN DOE-DOE, #1&2 (Who Took Legal Supreme Court Mail), D.W.C.F.,
JOAN SHOEMAKER,
DR. P. FRANTZ,
JANE/JOHN DOE-DOE, #3 (Who Took 2 Cub Feet Legal Box), D.W.C.F.,
Defendants.
ORDER DRAWING CASE
After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1C, the court has determined that
this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the
case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR
8.1D.
In addition, the motion (ECF No. 21) titled “Motion to Correct Typing Error and
Omissions” filed on July 13, 2012, will be denied. The motion is confusing because
Plaintiff fails to list the full sentences to be corrected and fails to make clear whether the
page numbers she refers to correspond to her page numbering on the amended
complaint filed on July 9, 2012, or the page numbering on the Court’s case
management/electronic case filing system (CM/ECF).
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate
judge. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion (ECF No. 21) titled “Motion to Correct
Typing Error and Omissions” filed on July 13, 2012, is denied.
DATED July 25, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?