Glasser v. King et al

Filing 287

ORDER granting 286 defendants, Carol King, Michael Walsh, and Lt. James Hardings Motion To Strike Plaintiffs 285 Response To The CDOC Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment. Glassers Response To CDOC Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment ECF No. 285 is STRICKEN for failure to comply with my PRACTICE STANDARDS. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Glasser SHALL RE-FILE a response to the CDOC Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment ECF No. 280 on or before Thursday, August 14, 2015., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 7/24/2014.(evana, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00624-WYD-CBS
WAYNE GLASSER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLE KING, R.N.;
MICHAEL WALSH, P.A.;
LT. JAMES HARDING; and,
MICHAEL HANSA, M.D., deceased, through surviving spouse and successor, WEERAANONG HANSA;
Defendants.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendants, Carol King, Michael Walsh,
and Lt. James Harding’s Motion To Strike Plaintiff’s Response To The CDOC
Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. 285) [ECF No. 286].
Pursuant to § II(E)(1) of my PRACTICE STANDARDS, “[t]he text of opening and
responsive briefs shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages in length.” The only exception to
this rule is where extraordinary circumstances exist “where the Court decides that the
complexity and numerosity of issues compel briefs of great length.” Senior Judge Wiley
Y. Daniel’s PRACTICE STANDARDS, § II(E)(2). In such a case, a party requesting
application of the exception must file a motion setting forth reasons as to why the
exception applies.

-1-

The text of pro-se plaintiff, Wayne Glasser’s, Response To CDOC Defendants’
Motion For Summary Judgment [ECF No. 285] exceeds 15 pages and Glasser did not
file a motion requesting that the exception apply. Thus, Glasser’s Response To CDOC
Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment [ECF No. 285] does not comply with my
PRACTICE STANDARDS. As such, it is
ORDERED that the motion [ECF No. 286] is GRANTED and Glasser’s Response
To CDOC Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment [ECF No. 285] is STRICKEN for
failure to comply with my PRACTICE STANDARDS. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Glasser SHALL RE-FILE a response to the CDOC
Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment [ECF No. 280] on or before Thursday,
August 14, 2015. The response SHALL COMPLY with § II(E)(1) of my PRACTICE
STANDARDS unless Glasser requests that the exception to my page limitation rule apply
and I find that extraordinary circumstances exist such that the exception is warranted.
Dated: July 24, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior U. S. District Judge

-2-