Hagos v. Clements et al
Filing
9
ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Abraham Hagos. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete record of Applicant's state court proceedings in People v. Hagos, Denver District Court Case No. 99CR2738. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/12/12. (mjgsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00678-REB
ABRAHAM HAGOS,
Applicant,
v.
TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, and
JAMES FALK, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility,
Respondents,
and
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General, State of Colorado,
Additional Respondent.
ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD
After preliminary consideration of the application for a writ of habeas corpus filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, it is
ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the
Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a
copy of the complete record of Applicant’s state court proceedings in People v. Hagos,
Denver District Court Case No. 99CR2738, including all documents in the state court file
and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any
physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted
claims. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of
this order to the following:
(1)
Clerk of the Court
Denver District Court
Room 256
1437 Bannock Street
Denver, CO 80202
(2)
Assistant Solicitor General
Appellate Division
Office of the Attorney General
1525 Sherman Street
Denver, Colorado 80203; and
(3)
Court Services Manager
State Court Administrator’s Office
101 W. Colfax, Ste. 500
Denver, Colorado 80202
DATED July 12, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?