Helmer et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., The

Filing 168

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson: Trial Preparation Conference held on 12/19/2014. granting in part and denying in part 154 Motion in Limine; granting 155 Motion in Limine; granting 156 Motion in Limine; granting 157 Motion in Limine; granting 158 Motion in Limine; denying 160 Motion to Supplement; denying 162 Motion in Limine; denying 166 Motion in Limine; denying 167 Motion in Limine. Jury instructions reviewed and ruled upon as stated on the record.Court Reporter: Tamara Hoffschildt. (jdyne, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE R. BROOKE JACKSON Civil Action: Courtroom Deputy: 12-cv-00685-RBJ-MEH Julie Dynes Date: December 19, 2014 Court Reporter: Tamara Hoffschildt Parties Counsel DAVID HELMER FELICIA MUFTIC MICHAEL MUFTIC CRAIG KANIA OLIVER MARTIN Rick D. Bailey Michael J. Flannery Katherine W. Van Dyck Jason S. Rathod Plaintiffs v. THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. David L. Lenyo David M. Stauss L. Michael Brooks, Jr. Roger P. Thomasch Defendants COURTROOM MINUTES TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE Court in Session: 9:00 a.m. Argument given on pending motions that have not had a response filed. ORDERED: [154] Defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Edward Fronapfel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. [155] Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine Regarding Expert Jorgen Bergstrom’s Computer Model is GRANTED. [156] Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Tetimony of Dr. Bruce Strombom is GRANTED. [157] Goodyear’s Motion in Limine to Preclude any Evidence Related to any Entran II Claim, Lawsuit, Settlement, or Judgment is GRANTED. [158] Goodyear’s Motion in Limine to Exclude any Evidence Related to any Claims Beyond Strict Liability for Design Defect is GRANTED. [160] Plaintiffs’ Motion for Supplemental Juror Questionnaire is DENIED. [162] Goodyear’s Motion to Exclude Testimony About Alleged Leaks or Hose Failures Where the Hose was not Preserved for Inspection is DENIED. [166] Goodyear’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony by Plaintiffs’ expert Dr. John E. Moalli is DENIED. [167] Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Entran 3 Installation Manuals or Instructions is DENIED. Jury instructions reviewed and ruled upon as stated on the record. Court in recess: Court in session: 10:27 a.m. 10:42 a.m. Discussion held on holding two phases regarding jury instructions. Court in recess: Court in session: 10:48 a.m. 10:59 a.m. Parties do not agree on two phases of jury instructions. Discussion held on length of jury trial and settlement discussions with a magistrate judge. Continued review of jury instructions with rulings as stated on the record. Discussion held on contacting the Court in the next two weeks, issues to be presented at trial, and contacting the magistrate judge. Court in Recess: 12:26 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 03:00

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?