Helmer et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., The

Filing 44

MINUTE ORDER denying 41 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Goodyear's Supplement to Reply in Support of Motion to Disqualify, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/29/2012. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00685-RBJ-MEH
DAVID HELMER,
FELICIA MUFTIC,
MICHAEL MUFTIC,
CRAIG KANIA, and
OLIVER MARTIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., an Ohio corporation,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 29, 2012.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Goodyear’s Supplement to Reply
in Support of Motion to Disqualify [filed August 7, 2012; docket #41]. Pursuant to D.C. Colo.
LCivR 7.1C, the Court provided Defendant with 21 days to respond to the motion; however,
Defendant has not done so. Upon review of Defendant’s Supplement to Reply in Support of Motion
to Disqualify [docket #40] and the July 31, 2012 Courtroom Minutes [docket #39], the Court does
not find that Defendant’s Supplement exceeds the scope of the Court’s instruction to “file a
supplement...regarding the timeline and notebook presented to the Court by Mr. Miller.” The Court
is mindful of Plaintiffs’ arguments and has considered them in its adjudication of the underlying
motion to disqualify, but does not find good cause to strike the Supplement. Therefore, Plaintiffs’
motion is denied.