Locke v. Fedex Corp, et al.,

Filing 129

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 105 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production, Inspection and Copying of Documents and to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/27/2014. (cpear) Modified on 3/28/2014 to correct text (cpear).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00708-REB-MEH
ANTHONY D. LOCKE,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDEX FREIGHT, INC., and
JON S. JONES,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 27, 2014.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production, Inspection and Copying of
Documents and to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline [filed November 12, 2013; docket #105].
This Court temporarily stayed briefing on the present motion pending resolution of the Court’s
recommendation for dismissal; however, due to the District Court’s substantially heavy workload,
the stay has essentially become indefinite. Therefore, in the interest of judicial economy and
efficiency, the Court will deny the motion without prejudice at this time. Upon the District Court’s
order resolving the pending recommendation, the Plaintiff may simply file a motion seeking to
“renew the motion to compel at docket #105,” if appropriate and if he chooses to do so.