Wyers, et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al

Filing 55

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Discovery Hearing held on 12/27/2012. The court DENIES without prejudice 51 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. FTR: Robin Mason. (cbscd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action:12-cv-00750-WYD-CBS
Date: December 27, 2012

FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason

Parties:

Counsel:

PHILIP W. WYERS, et al.,

Matthew Nelson
R. Parker Semler

Plaintiffs,

v.
LAURA M. KLAUS, et al.,

Meredith Martin Addy
Michael Lloyd Hutchinson
Abby Lynn Parsons

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY CONFERENCE
Court in Session:
9:02 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
The court addresses the parties regarding the defendant’s MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify
#47 Order on Motion to Stay,,, Order on Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court,,
(Docket No. 50, filed on 12/14/2012) that is no longer to Magistrate Judge Shaffer. The court
advises the parties that this motion shall be ruled on by Chief Judge Daniel.
The court addresses the parties regarding the plaintiff’s Unopposed MOTION to
Amend/Correct/Modify #23 Scheduling Order (Docket No. 51, filed on 12/14/2012).
Discussion between the court and the parties regarding the amended complaint, Rule 15
pertaining to filing a motion to dismiss, possible trial dates, setting depositions, experts, how
many depositions each side plans to take, the scheduling conference held on May 18, 2012, and
the current discovery deadlines.

ORDERED: The court DENIES without prejudice the plaintiff’s Unopposed MOTION to
Amend/Correct/Modify #23 Scheduling Order (Docket No. 51, filed on
12/14/2012).
The parties are advised to meet to come up with realistic deadlines and explain how these
deadlines were selected. This information shall be filed with the court in the form of a motion.
The court addresses the parties regarding the defendant’s MOTION for Protective Order (Docket
No. 44, filed on 11/30/2012) and Magistrate Judge Shaffer’s ORDER denying, without
prejudice, Defendant's #44 Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 46, filed on 12/4/2012).
Discussion between the court and the parties regarding the defendant’s MOTION for Protective
Order (Docket No. 44, filed on 11/30/2012), Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and
Rule 26(b)(1). The court cites relevant case law. Defense counsel may file another motion
seeking a protective order.
Discussion between the court and the parties regarding what written discovery has been
completed, Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 26(c), Rule 37(a), Rule 26(g), and
Rule 37(a)(5).
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess:
Total time in court:

10:03 a.m.
01:01

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at
[phone] or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.