Wyers, et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al

Filing 70

ORDER denying as moot 29 Motion to Dismiss and Renewed Motion to Strike and granting 50 Motion. Section D of December 12, 2012, Order [ECF No. 47 ] entitled "The Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint is STRICKEN from the Order as it was previously worded. December 12, 2012, Order shall be restricted at Level 1 restriction. By Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/6/13.(mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 12-cv-00750-WYD-CBS PHILIP W. WYERS, and, WYERS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs, v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP; MARK L. HOGGE; LAURA M. KLAUS; and, ROBERT P. CHARROW, Defendants. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion To Modify December 12, 2012 Order To Conform To Record, And To Restrict Public Access [ECF No. 50]. After careful consideration, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ motion [ECF No. 50] is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Section D of my December 12, 2012, Order [ECF No. 47] entitled “The Defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff’s Complaint” is STRICKEN from the Order as it was previously worded. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the record reflects that the defendants substantially complied with Magistrate Judge Shaffer’s May 18, 2012, Amended Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order [ECF No. 24] by filing a Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 29] on June 7, 2013, as opposed to filing an answer as directed by Magistrate Judge Shaffer. It is -1- FURTHER ORDERED that my December 12, 2012, Order shall be restricted at Level 1 restriction. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Renewed Motion to Strike [ECF No. 29], filed on June 7, 2012, is DENIED AS MOOT. Dated: February 6, 2013. BY THE COURT: /s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Senior U. S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?