Jansen v. Astrue

Filing 11

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/6/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/5/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/20/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/25/12. (gmssl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00753-AP
M.J. JANSEN
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Gordon W. Williams
143 Union Blvd. Suite 270
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Telephone [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 Seventeenth Street, Sixth Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
303-844-0815
303-844-0770 Facsimile
[e-mail]

-1-

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed:

March 22, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office:

April 6, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed:

June 5, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
Counsel for Plaintiff states: To the best of his knowledge, that the record is complete and
accurate.
Counsel for Defendant states: To the best of her knowledge, that the record is complete and
accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
Counsel for Plaintiff states: To the best of his knowledge, this case does not involve unusual
claims or defenses.
Counsel for Defendant states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve
unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
There are no other matters anticipated.

-2-

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule:
A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due:

August 6, 2012

B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

September 5, 2012

C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

September 20, 2012

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiffs Statement:
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant’s Statement:
Defendant does not request oral argument
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY
OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT,
ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.

-3-

DATED this 25th day of June, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane ________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:
/s/
Gordon W. Williams
143 Union Boulevard, Suite 270
Lakewood, Colorado 80228
Telephone [phone]
[e-mail]

JAMES F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
/s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Assistant Regional Counsel
1001 Seventeenth Street, Sixth Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant.

-4-