Riggan v. Glendale, Colorado, City of et al
Filing
56
ORDER Setting Second Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/2013 11:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 28, 2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties or representatives permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/19/2013. (Motion 55 terminated) (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00763-RPM
RANDY LEE RIGGAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF GLENDALE, COLORADO, a municipality,
OFFICER CHRIS TYROLT, in his official and individual capacity,
SERGEANT CRYSTAL JOHNSON, in her official and individual capacity, and
SERGEANT JIM BANG, in his official and individual capacity,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER SETTING SECOND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
____________________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is
ORDERED that a second scheduling conference will be held on March 8, 2013, at 11:30
a.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823
Stout Street, Denver, Colorado.
Preparation
of
Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for
Scheduling
Order
which
may
be
found
at
http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx (Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures)
and use the format provided with those instructions (Rev. 11/11). The proposed order (original
only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 28, 2013. The
conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of
parties will be permitted to attend.
Dated: February 19th, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?