Riggan v. Glendale, Colorado, City of et al

Filing 56

ORDER Setting Second Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/2013 11:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 28, 2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties or representatives permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/19/2013. (Motion 55 terminated) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 12-cv-00763-RPM RANDY LEE RIGGAN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF GLENDALE, COLORADO, a municipality, OFFICER CHRIS TYROLT, in his official and individual capacity, SERGEANT CRYSTAL JOHNSON, in her official and individual capacity, and SERGEANT JIM BANG, in his official and individual capacity, Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER SETTING SECOND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ____________________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is ORDERED that a second scheduling conference will be held on March 8, 2013, at 11:30 a.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Preparation of Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Scheduling Order which may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx (Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions (Rev. 11/11). The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 28, 2013. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend. Dated: February 19th, 2013 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?