Silver v. Astrue

Filing 11

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiff's Brief due by 8/14/2012. SS Defendant's Brief due by 9/13/2012. SS Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 9/28/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/6/12. (lygsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-00771-JLK PAULA SILVER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: For Defendant: MICHAEL A. DESAULNIERS 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 seckarlaw@mindspring.com JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney’s Office District of Colorado kevin.traskos@usdoj.gov ROBERT VANSAGHI Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 Seventeenth Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-7237 robert.vansaghi@usdoj.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: March 27, 2012 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: April 20, 2012 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: June 14, 2012 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Neither party intends to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the court. 8. PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE Because of workload and scheduling conflicts, the parties respectfully respect briefing to commence later than 40 days after the filing of this Joint Case Management Plan. Counsel for both parties agrees to the following proposed briefing schedule: A. B. C. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: August 14, 2012 Defendant's Response Brief Due: September 13, 2012 Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: September 28, 2012 2 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE Indicate below the parties' consent choice. A. B. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorney’s client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 6th day of July, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 3 APPROVED: For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney For Plaintiff: s/ Michael A. Desaulniers Michael A. Desaulniers 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 seckarlaw@mindspring.com KEVIN TRASKOS Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney’s Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov s/ Robert L. Van Saghi Robert L. Van Saghi Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 1001 17th Street Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 844-1948 robert.vansaghi@ssa.gov 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?