Stanton v. Encompass Indemnity Company

Filing 72

MINUTE ORDER denying in part and granting in part 64 Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant Encompass Indemnity Company's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. Defendant may file a Surreply of no more than five pages to Plaintiff's 63 Reply on or before 5/2/2013. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/18/13.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-00801-PAB-KLM PAULA STANTON, a Colorado resident, and PATRICK STANTON, a Colorado resident, Plaintiffs, v. ENCOMPASS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendant Encompass Indemnity Company’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Docket No. 64; Filed February 6, 2013] (the “Motion”). On February 19, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Response [#67]. On March 8, 2013, Defendant filed a Reply [#69]. In the Motion, Defendant seeks to strike Plaintiffs’ Reply [#63] to Defendant’s Response [#59] to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint [#53] because it assertedly raises new facts and new arguments. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#64] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. The Motion is denied to the extent Defendant seeks to strike Plaintiff’s Reply [#63]. The Motion is granted to the extent Defendant seeks leave to file a Surreply. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may file a Surreply of no more than five pages to Plaintiff’s Reply [#63] on or before May 2, 2013. Dated: April 18, 2013 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?