Templeton v. Fehn et al

Filing 52

Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 5/30/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Non-Party FINRA's Motion to Quash Rule 45 Subpoena Of FINRA Employee Sophia Krunic, 47 , is denied for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Determination of a Question of Law Re Immunity of FINRA for the Administrative Acts of its Employees 48 , was discussed and no advisory ruling issued. Interested Party FINRA terminated. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
May 30, 2013
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00859-RPM
FORREST DARYL TEMPLETON,

Francis V. Cristiano

Plaintiff,
v.
H. THOMAS FEHN, individually;
ORLY DAVIDI, individually;
GREGORY J. SHERWIN, individually;
FIELDS FEHN & SHERWIN, a California General Partnership; and
CATLIN SPECIALTY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation,

No appearance

John R. Mann

Defendants,
And
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY,
“FINRA”,

Robert C. Blume
Laura Sturges

Interested Party.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Pending Motions
11:00 a.m.

Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks.
Statement by Ms. Sturges.
Ms. Sturges states FINRA’s entire case filed has been produced.
Statement by Mr. Cristiano.
Ms. Sturges answers questions asked by the Court regarding documents produced.
Ms. Sturges states FINRA is willing to have a declaration prepared by Ms. Krunic regarding certifying
documents produced.
Counsel agree to confer.

May 30, 2013
12-cv-00859-RPM
Discussion between Court and counsel.
ORDERED:

Non-Party FINRA's Motion to Quash Rule 45 Subpoena Of FINRA Employee
Sophia Krunic, [47], is denied for lack of jurisdiction.

ORDERED:

Plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Determination of a Question of Law Re Immunity of
FINRA for the Administrative Acts of its Employees [48], was discussed and no
advisory ruling issued.
Court suggests arbitral immunity.

Discussion regarding scheduling.
Mr. Cristiano states he anticipates filing a motion to amend to add claims (exemplary damages and bad
faith).
11:17 a.m.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 17 min.

2