Bancroft et al v. Harris Transportation Company LLC

Filing 6

ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 7/19/2012 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 12, 2012, lead counsel present in person and no parties permitted to attend, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/1/2012. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 12-cv-00864-RPM GAIL L. BANCROFT, individually and a next friend of her minor daughters, REBECCA HUGHES, FAITHUGHES and EMILY HUGHES, and G. WARREN BANCROFT, Plaintiffs, v. HARRIS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ____________________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on July 19, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order which may be found at (Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions (Rev. 11/11). The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 12, 2012. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the defendant shall file a disclosure statement pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.4. Dated: June 1st, 2012 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?